Global Index Score
24.25
Jamaica's index score lands +1.8 against the Caribbean average (22.4) and -7.6 against Upper middle income peers (31.9). It scores ahead of 35% of the 135 countries and jurisdictions assessed this edition. The profile rests on 13 documented evidence items spanning policy frameworks, government initiatives and civil society activity.
GIRAI evaluates countries across five core dimensions that capture the social, ethical, and institutional impacts of artificial intelligence.
AI Policy
10.53
Avrg. Score
10.23
Enabling Conditions
57.21
Avrg. Score
52.39
Civil Society Engagement
7.69
Avrg. Score
5.62
22.14
Index Score
25.07
Avrg. Dimension score
Jamaica runs -2.9 against the regional average (25.1) on Inclusion and Diversity. Strongest indicators: Gender Equality (0.0), Children's Rights (0.0). Weakest: Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (0.0). This dimension ranks 86th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (88th). 1 evidence items on file, including "WE-TALK".
31.15
Index Score
19.89
Avrg. Dimension score
Jamaica runs +11.3 against the regional average (19.9) on Ethics and Sustainability. Strongest indicators: Transparency and Explainability (67.7), Human Oversight and Determination (67.0). Weakest: Environmental Impact (0.0), Fairness and Non-discrimination (9.1). This dimension ranks 72nd globally — ahead of the country's overall position (88th). 5 evidence items on file, including "Data Protection Act 2020 (Jamaica)" and 2 other documented items.
26.66
Index Score
25.80
Avrg. Dimension score
Jamaica runs +0.9 against the regional average (25.8) on Labour and Skills. Strongest indicators: Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives (18.2), AI Literacy (9.1). Weakest: Labour Protections (0.0). 4 evidence items on file, including "Govt to implement AI workforce readiness strategy" and 3 other documented items.
19.57
Index Score
19.23
Avrg. Dimension score
Jamaica runs +0.3 against the regional average (19.2) on Trust and Safety. Strongest indicators: Safety and Security (9.1), AI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence (9.1). Weakest: Impact Assessments (0.0), Access to Redress and Remedy (0.0). This dimension ranks 109th globally — behind the country's overall position (88th). 2 evidence items on file, including "National Child Online Protection Committee (NCOP)" and 1 other documented items.
21.72
Index Score
22.10
Avrg. Dimension score
Jamaica runs -0.4 against the regional average (22.1) on AI Use in Public Service. Strongest indicators: Public Sector Skills Development (9.1), Public Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems (0.0). Weakest: Public Procurement (0.0). This dimension ranks 89th globally — behind the country's overall position (88th). 1 evidence items on file, including "Reskilling Upskilling and Re-skilling (RUN) Project".
Explore how country performance, scores, and governance indicators have changed between GIRAI editions.
14 indicators
| Indicator | 2024 Edition | 2026 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Gender Equality | No Framework | No Framework |
| Children's Rights | No Framework | No Framework |
| Cultural and Linguistic Diversity | No Framework | No Framework |
| Fairness and Non-discrimination | No Framework | No Framework |
| Transparency and Explainability | Binding Framework | Binding Framework |
| Human Oversight and Determination | Binding Framework | Binding Framework |
| Labour Protections | No Framework | No Framework |
| Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | No Framework | No Framework |
| Safety and Security | No Framework | No Framework |
| Access to Redress and Remedy | No Framework | No Framework |
| Impact Assessments | No Framework | No Framework |
| Public Sector Skills Development | No Framework | No Framework |
| Public Procurement | No Framework | No Framework |
| Government Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | No Framework | No Framework |
Indicator definitions changed between editions; this table compares evidence presence and status, not directly comparable scores. A — indicates the item is not applicable or was not assessed for that edition.
Explore how countries and regions perform across GIRAI's governance dimensions, scores, and structural indicators.
| Indicator | Jamaica | Caribbean |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion and Diversity7 | ||
APGender Equality | 0.0 | 11.4 |
APChildren's Rights | 0.0 | 0.0 |
APCultural and Linguistic Diversity | 0.0 | 9.0 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Inclusion and Diversity | 7.7 | 7.7 |
ECEgalitarian Democracy | 77.5 | 56.5 |
ECDevice Affordability | 36.1 | 49.7 |
ECGender Gap in Mobile Internet | 100.0 | 95.9 |
| Ethics and Sustainability7 | ||
APFairness and Non-discrimination | 9.1 | 16.9 |
APTransparency and Explainability | 67.7 | 19.1 |
APHuman Oversight and Determination | 67.0 | 16.8 |
APEnvironmental Impact | 0.0 | 8.9 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Ethics and Sustainability | 0.0 | 1.0 |
ECLow-Carbon Energy Share | 12.6 | 19.6 |
ECRule of Law | 51.2 | 50.7 |
| Labour and Skills6 | ||
APLabour Protections | 0.0 | 2.3 |
APReskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | 18.2 | 21.4 |
APAI Literacy | 9.1 | 12.9 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Labour and Skills | 30.8 | 5.1 |
ECLabour Rights & Compliance | 56.1 | 54.9 |
ECSkills & Literacy | 64.8 | 64.9 |
| Trust and Safety10 | ||
APSafety and Security | 9.1 | 11.6 |
APAccess to Redress and Remedy | 0.0 | 7.9 |
APImpact Assessments | 0.0 | 1.4 |
APAI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence | 9.1 | 13.7 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Trust and Safety | 0.0 | 0.6 |
ECData Protection and Privacy | 41.8 | 36.1 |
ECData Sharing and Access | 43.8 | 25.8 |
ECConsumer Protection | 75.4 | 73.1 |
ECCybersecurity | 55.9 | 38.0 |
ECGlobal Peace | 63.8 | 59.9 |
| AI Use in Public Service7 | ||
APPublic Sector Skills Development | 9.1 | 13.8 |
APPublic Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems | 0.0 | 0.0 |
APPublic Procurement | 0.0 | 10.4 |
CSOGovernment Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | 0.0 | 13.8 |
ECCivil Society Accountability | 91.8 | 81.0 |
ECPublic Service Delivery | 66.7 | 46.6 |
ECAccess to Public Information | 40.5 | 31.4 |
| Score adjustment | ||
URAIUnacceptable Risk AI Systems | No penalty | No penalty |
A breakdown of the structural factors shaping this country's score.
National AI strategies, laws, and oversight mechanisms that establish formal governance structures.
Contribution to overall score
26%
Participation of academia, advocacy groups, and non-state actors in shaping governance and ensuring accountability.
Contribution to overall score
3%
Institutional capacity, rule of law, digital readiness, and labour protections that enable effective governance.
Contribution to overall score
71%
Explore how 135 countries are governing artificial intelligence through the world's most comprehensive evidence-based Responsible AI Index.
8 pieces of evidence assessed across 13 indicator cases — laws, policies, strategies, and institutional actions in Jamaica.
