Global Index Score
20.52
State of Palestine's index score lands -11.6 against the Middle East average (32.1) and -6.4 against Lower middle income peers (27.0). It scores ahead of 28% of the 135 countries and jurisdictions assessed this edition. The profile rests on 4 documented evidence items spanning policy frameworks, government initiatives and civil society activity.
GIRAI evaluates countries across five core dimensions that capture the social, ethical, and institutional impacts of artificial intelligence.
AI Policy
12.12
Avrg. Score
26.13
Enabling Conditions
43.98
Avrg. Score
52.95
Civil Society Engagement
0.50
Avrg. Score
13.39
28.71
Index Score
32.56
Avrg. Dimension score
State of Palestine runs -3.9 against the regional average (32.6) on Inclusion and Diversity. Strongest indicators: Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (58.0), Children's Rights (9.1). Weakest: Gender Equality (0.0). This dimension ranks 67th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (98th). 2 evidence items on file, including "National Artificial Intelligence Strategy in the State of Palestine" and 1 other documented items.
10.30
Index Score
31.58
Avrg. Dimension score
State of Palestine runs -21.3 against the regional average (31.6) on Ethics and Sustainability. Strongest indicators: Fairness and Non-discrimination (0.0), Transparency and Explainability (0.0). Weakest: Environmental Impact (0.0), Human Oversight and Determination (0.0). This dimension ranks 123rd globally — behind the country's overall position (98th). No dimension-specific evidence items are on file.
27.09
Index Score
34.73
Avrg. Dimension score
State of Palestine runs -7.6 against the regional average (34.7) on Labour and Skills. Strongest indicators: Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives (56.8), Labour Protections (0.0). Weakest: AI Literacy (0.0). This dimension ranks 86th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (98th). 1 evidence items on file, including "National Artificial Intelligence Policy (Palestine)".
11.26
Index Score
36.90
Avrg. Dimension score
State of Palestine runs -25.6 against the regional average (36.9) on Trust and Safety. Strongest indicators: Safety and Security (0.0), Access to Redress and Remedy (0.0). Weakest: AI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence (0.0), Impact Assessments (0.0). This dimension ranks 128th globally — behind the country's overall position (98th). No dimension-specific evidence items are on file.
25.22
Index Score
28.75
Avrg. Dimension score
State of Palestine runs -3.5 against the regional average (28.7) on AI Use in Public Service. Strongest indicators: Public Sector Skills Development (58.0), Public Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems (0.0). Weakest: Public Procurement (0.0). This dimension ranks 75th globally — ahead of the country's overall position (98th). 1 evidence items on file, including "National Artificial Intelligence Strategy in the State of Palestine".
Explore how country performance, scores, and governance indicators have changed between GIRAI editions.
14 indicators
| Indicator | 2024 Edition | 2026 Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Gender Equality | No Framework | No Framework |
| Children's Rights | Draft | No Framework |
| Cultural and Linguistic Diversity | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Fairness and Non-discrimination | Draft | No Framework |
| Transparency and Explainability | Draft | No Framework |
| Human Oversight and Determination | Draft | No Framework |
| Labour Protections | No Framework | No Framework |
| Reskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Safety and Security | Draft | No Framework |
| Access to Redress and Remedy | Draft | No Framework |
| Impact Assessments | Draft | No Framework |
| Public Sector Skills Development | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
| Public Procurement | No Framework | No Framework |
| Government Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | Non-Binding Framework | Non-Binding Framework |
Indicator definitions changed between editions; this table compares evidence presence and status, not directly comparable scores. A — indicates the item is not applicable or was not assessed for that edition.
Explore how countries and regions perform across GIRAI's governance dimensions, scores, and structural indicators.
| Indicator | State of Palestine | Middle East |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion and Diversity7 | ||
APGender Equality | 0.0 | 25.2 |
APChildren's Rights | 9.1 | 15.8 |
APCultural and Linguistic Diversity | 58.0 | 30.0 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Inclusion and Diversity | 0.0 | 10.8 |
ECEgalitarian Democracy | 20.8 | 22.4 |
ECDevice Affordability | 40.4 | 62.7 |
ECGender Gap in Mobile Internet | 91.9 | 87.7 |
| Ethics and Sustainability7 | ||
APFairness and Non-discrimination | 0.0 | 36.3 |
APTransparency and Explainability | 0.0 | 41.0 |
APHuman Oversight and Determination | 0.0 | 36.7 |
APEnvironmental Impact | 0.0 | 13.7 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Ethics and Sustainability | 0.0 | 16.9 |
ECLow-Carbon Energy Share | 39.4 | 16.6 |
ECRule of Law | 29.3 | 55.1 |
| Labour and Skills6 | ||
APLabour Protections | 0.0 | 6.3 |
APReskilling/Upskilling Initiatives | 56.8 | 49.4 |
APAI Literacy | 0.0 | 29.8 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Labour and Skills | 0.0 | 11.3 |
ECLabour Rights & Compliance | 30.2 | 28.1 |
ECSkills & Literacy | 74.7 | 82.0 |
| Trust and Safety10 | ||
APSafety and Security | 0.0 | 38.2 |
APAccess to Redress and Remedy | 0.0 | 22.0 |
APImpact Assessments | 0.0 | 35.7 |
APAI-facilitated Misinformation and Violence | 0.0 | 12.0 |
CSOCivil Society Engagement in Trust and Safety | 0.0 | 8.4 |
ECData Protection and Privacy | 61.2 | 53.7 |
ECData Sharing and Access | 0.0 | 57.5 |
ECConsumer Protection | 63.3 | 80.2 |
ECCybersecurity | 34.5 | 80.9 |
ECGlobal Peace | 28.7 | 59.2 |
| AI Use in Public Service7 | ||
APPublic Sector Skills Development | 58.0 | 37.5 |
APPublic Disclosure of Government Algorithmic Systems | 0.0 | 4.1 |
APPublic Procurement | 0.0 | 17.4 |
CSOGovernment Mechanisms for CSO Inclusion in AI Policy and Governance | 2.5 | 19.6 |
ECCivil Society Accountability | 38.9 | 41.0 |
ECPublic Service Delivery | 64.0 | 80.3 |
ECAccess to Public Information | 31.0 | 28.5 |
| Score adjustment | ||
URAIUnacceptable Risk AI Systems | No penalty | ×0.98Regional average |
A breakdown of the structural factors shaping this country's score.
National AI strategies, laws, and oversight mechanisms that establish formal governance structures.
Contribution to overall score
35%
Participation of academia, advocacy groups, and non-state actors in shaping governance and ensuring accountability.
Contribution to overall score
0%
Institutional capacity, rule of law, digital readiness, and labour protections that enable effective governance.
Contribution to overall score
64%
Explore how 135 countries are governing artificial intelligence through the world's most comprehensive evidence-based Responsible AI Index.
3 pieces of evidence assessed across 4 indicator cases — laws, policies, strategies, and institutional actions in State of Palestine.
