THEMATIC AREAS
This thematic area measures steps countries have taken to strengthen and facilitate international cooperation on AI.
International cooperation can be defined as "a collaborative relationship between [countries] to work toward shared objectives through a mutually agreed division of labor."
Country and regional scores
Bright spots
Goverment Frameworks - Vietnam
Government actions - Palestine
Non-state actors - Benin
Relevance
The ubiquitous nature of AI means that it operates across borders. However, countries around the world vary significantly in their capacities to develop and use AI systems independently and responsibly. Limitations due to inadequate data for use in AI systems, weak or outdated digital infrastructure, and low levels of AI literacy and capacity are likely to position many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) at a significant disadvantage when it comes to leveraging the opportunities and protecting against the risks posed by AI. AI is also a resource-intensive process, requiring large investments and innovation, both at the state level and in industries. This often means it is difficult to tackle AI without support, and based on resources, it can create major gaps between countries.
EVIDENCE
Evidence Explorer
Discover and compare all all the evidence collected under this thematic area using our Evidence Explorer tool
SCORES
Country rankings by International co-operation
*In the table above, data was collected for Chinese Taipei (commonly referred to as Taiwan) and the West Bank, which is under the administration of the Palestinian Authority. No data collection took place in Gaza. We recognize that these are, at the time of writing, disputed jurisdictions.
















