THEMATIC AREAS
This thematic area measures steps countries have taken to promote and ensure sufficient levels of transparency and explainability in the development, use and deployment of AI technologies
Transparency is defined as ‘the quality of [a process, practice or decision] being done in an open way without secrets so people can trust that [actions] are fair and honest’.
Explainability can be defined as ‘the quality of enabling people to understand how a particular system works and/or how a particular outcome was achieved by providing information that is sensible and easy to-understand’.
Country and regional scores
Bright spots
Goverment Frameworks - Jordan
Government actions - France
Civil Society - Ireland
Relevance
AI systems and tools are continuously evolving and increasingly permeating today’s digital landscape and society at large. Reliance on AI technologies to perform various functions both with and without people’s knowledge, such as making predictions, recommendations, and decisions, has reinforced the need for increased levels of transparency around use of these systems and explanations for how they work and the impact they make. Understanding the reasoning behind AI-generated decisions, the timing and purpose of deploying AI systems, as well as the processes and training data that shape them, becomes crucial due to the potential risks associated with these emerging technologies.
EVIDENCE
Evidence Explorer
Discover and compare all all the evidence collected under this thematic area using our Evidence Explorer tool
SCORES
Country rankings by Transparency and explainability
*In the table above, data was collected for Chinese Taipei (commonly referred to as Taiwan) and the West Bank, which is under the administration of the Palestinian Authority. No data collection took place in Gaza. We recognize that these are, at the time of writing, disputed jurisdictions.
















